<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Delivery Now Streeting With Traditional Home Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/</link>
	<description>The landscape of the entertainment business and deal making culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: corine</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>corine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>A-Ha!  you&#039;ve earned yourself a new reader!  Funny I&#039;m reading &#039;getting things done&quot;  at the moment (as a download from the library).   We&#039;re reading the same blogs, the same books, and apparently the same magazines as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A-Ha!  you&#8217;ve earned yourself a new reader!  Funny I&#8217;m reading &#8216;getting things done&#8221;  at the moment (as a download from the library).   We&#8217;re reading the same blogs, the same books, and apparently the same magazines as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corine</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>corine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>A-Ha!  you&#039;ve earned yourself a new reader!  Funny I&#039;m reading &#039;getting things done&quot;  at the moment (as a download from the library).   We&#039;re reading the same blogs, the same books, and apparently the same magazines as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A-Ha!  you&#8217;ve earned yourself a new reader!  Funny I&#8217;m reading &#8216;getting things done&#8221;  at the moment (as a download from the library).   We&#8217;re reading the same blogs, the same books, and apparently the same magazines as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve corn</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>steve corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>there is a parallel in the music biz.  Recording artists want to have digital revenue treated as licensing revenue instead of royalty income.  The latter is typically paid out at the artist&#039;s royalty rate and subject to the various recoupments associated with a record deal.  However, most artist deals have provisions that have a 50/50 split on licensing revenue.  This type of revenue may not even be subject to recoupment.

The Artist&#039;s case is based on the fact that labels &quot;license&quot; their content to services like iTunes.  But this is really just semantics.  Still, the distinction has real fiscal impact to both labels and artists alike.

This is why I am very interested to see how the issue of internet income is resolved in  both the WGA strike and with simulataneous releases such as &quot;The Bourne Ultimatum.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a parallel in the music biz.  Recording artists want to have digital revenue treated as licensing revenue instead of royalty income.  The latter is typically paid out at the artist&#8217;s royalty rate and subject to the various recoupments associated with a record deal.  However, most artist deals have provisions that have a 50/50 split on licensing revenue.  This type of revenue may not even be subject to recoupment.</p>
<p>The Artist&#8217;s case is based on the fact that labels &#8220;license&#8221; their content to services like iTunes.  But this is really just semantics.  Still, the distinction has real fiscal impact to both labels and artists alike.</p>
<p>This is why I am very interested to see how the issue of internet income is resolved in  both the WGA strike and with simulataneous releases such as &#8220;The Bourne Ultimatum.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve corn</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>steve corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/#comment-664</guid>
		<description>there is a parallel in the music biz.  Recording artists want to have digital revenue treated as licensing revenue instead of royalty income.  The latter is typically paid out at the artist&#039;s royalty rate and subject to the various recoupments associated with a record deal.  However, most artist deals have provisions that have a 50/50 split on licensing revenue.  This type of revenue may not even be subject to recoupment.

The Artist&#039;s case is based on the fact that labels &quot;license&quot; their content to services like iTunes.  But this is really just semantics.  Still, the distinction has real fiscal impact to both labels and artists alike.

This is why I am very interested to see how the issue of internet income is resolved in  both the WGA strike and with simulataneous releases such as &quot;The Bourne Ultimatum.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a parallel in the music biz.  Recording artists want to have digital revenue treated as licensing revenue instead of royalty income.  The latter is typically paid out at the artist&#8217;s royalty rate and subject to the various recoupments associated with a record deal.  However, most artist deals have provisions that have a 50/50 split on licensing revenue.  This type of revenue may not even be subject to recoupment.</p>
<p>The Artist&#8217;s case is based on the fact that labels &#8220;license&#8221; their content to services like iTunes.  But this is really just semantics.  Still, the distinction has real fiscal impact to both labels and artists alike.</p>
<p>This is why I am very interested to see how the issue of internet income is resolved in  both the WGA strike and with simulataneous releases such as &#8220;The Bourne Ultimatum.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katherine stephens</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>katherine stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>It seems to be, if I understand this....is that the entire industry is becoming used to what will be the same industry....going vertical, as they say in other industries. Yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be, if I understand this&#8230;.is that the entire industry is becoming used to what will be the same industry&#8230;.going vertical, as they say in other industries. Yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katherine stephens</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>katherine stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2007/12/16/internet-delivery-now-streeting-with-traditional-home-video/#comment-663</guid>
		<description>It seems to be, if I understand this....is that the entire industry is becoming used to what will be the same industry....going vertical, as they say in other industries. Yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be, if I understand this&#8230;.is that the entire industry is becoming used to what will be the same industry&#8230;.going vertical, as they say in other industries. Yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

