<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Money For Nuthin&#8217; or Nick&#8217;s For Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/</link>
	<description>The landscape of the entertainment business and deal making culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 20:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 02:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Brett,

There’s always the concern of a slippery slope. What evolves today may become the abusive practice of tomorrow.

Given the fluctuation of negotiating power between the reps representing the Brad Pitts of the business and those representing just off the bus talent, I am confident that there will be a check on the most severe forms of this deal point. Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett,</p>
<p>There’s always the concern of a slippery slope. What evolves today may become the abusive practice of tomorrow.</p>
<p>Given the fluctuation of negotiating power between the reps representing the Brad Pitts of the business and those representing just off the bus talent, I am confident that there will be a check on the most severe forms of this deal point. Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Brett,

There’s always the concern of a slippery slope. What evolves today may become the abusive practice of tomorrow.

Given the fluctuation of negotiating power between the reps representing the Brad Pitts of the business and those representing just off the bus talent, I am confident that there will be a check on the most severe forms of this deal point. Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett,</p>
<p>There’s always the concern of a slippery slope. What evolves today may become the abusive practice of tomorrow.</p>
<p>Given the fluctuation of negotiating power between the reps representing the Brad Pitts of the business and those representing just off the bus talent, I am confident that there will be a check on the most severe forms of this deal point. Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>What vaguely concerns me -- and then in only the most optimistic sort of way -- is what happens when this sort of point spreads beyond these cable network deals and into other areas of entertainment. Are we going to see actors and writers all forced to sign indentured services contracts whereby Universal (f&#039;rinstance) gets to skim my future screenwriting revenue in return for producing an early screenplay?

I understand the net&#039;s position to some extent: in the case of Cyrus, for example, Disney has nurtured her career like mad for a few years now to create this monster that generates great honking gobs of delightful cash. But it seems a little scary to think about the weird ways this could turn out.

Nice blog, btw.

B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What vaguely concerns me &#8212; and then in only the most optimistic sort of way &#8212; is what happens when this sort of point spreads beyond these cable network deals and into other areas of entertainment. Are we going to see actors and writers all forced to sign indentured services contracts whereby Universal (f&#8217;rinstance) gets to skim my future screenwriting revenue in return for producing an early screenplay?</p>
<p>I understand the net&#8217;s position to some extent: in the case of Cyrus, for example, Disney has nurtured her career like mad for a few years now to create this monster that generates great honking gobs of delightful cash. But it seems a little scary to think about the weird ways this could turn out.</p>
<p>Nice blog, btw.</p>
<p>B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealfatigue.com/2008/03/18/money-for-nuthin-or-nicks-for-free/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>What vaguely concerns me -- and then in only the most optimistic sort of way -- is what happens when this sort of point spreads beyond these cable network deals and into other areas of entertainment. Are we going to see actors and writers all forced to sign indentured services contracts whereby Universal (f&#039;rinstance) gets to skim my future screenwriting revenue in return for producing an early screenplay?

I understand the net&#039;s position to some extent: in the case of Cyrus, for example, Disney has nurtured her career like mad for a few years now to create this monster that generates great honking gobs of delightful cash. But it seems a little scary to think about the weird ways this could turn out.

Nice blog, btw.

B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What vaguely concerns me &#8212; and then in only the most optimistic sort of way &#8212; is what happens when this sort of point spreads beyond these cable network deals and into other areas of entertainment. Are we going to see actors and writers all forced to sign indentured services contracts whereby Universal (f&#8217;rinstance) gets to skim my future screenwriting revenue in return for producing an early screenplay?</p>
<p>I understand the net&#8217;s position to some extent: in the case of Cyrus, for example, Disney has nurtured her career like mad for a few years now to create this monster that generates great honking gobs of delightful cash. But it seems a little scary to think about the weird ways this could turn out.</p>
<p>Nice blog, btw.</p>
<p>B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

